Patient Engagement and Informed Decision Making Regarding Medical Imaging
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Patient engagement and informed decision making regarding medical imaging.
Misuse and overuse of medical imaging have gained widespread attention due to rising costs, radiation exposure risks, and limited comparative effectiveness evidence. Involving patients in shared decision making offers an opportunity to more clearly define risks and benefits, thus allowing patients to consider both personal values and the best available evidence.
متن کاملPatient engagement in healthcare: pathways for effective medical decision making
Making patients protagonists of decisions about their care is a primacy in the 21st century medical ethics. Precisely, to favor shared treatment decisions potentially enables patients’ autonomy and self-determination, and protects patients’ rights to make decisions about their own future care. To fully accomplish this goal, medicine should take into account the complexity of the healthcare deci...
متن کاملPatient decision-making: medical ethics and mediation.
A review of medical ethics literature relating to the importance of the participation of patients in decision-making introduces the role of rights-based mediation as a voluntary process now being developed innovatively in America. This is discussed in relation to the theory of communicative ethics and moral personhood. References are then made to the work of medical ethics committees and the ro...
متن کاملPatient decision-making: medical ethics and mediation
A review of medical ethics literature relating to the importance of the participation ofpatients in decisionmaking introduces the role of rights-based mediation as a voluntary process now being developed innovatively in America. This is discussed in relation to the theory of communicative ethics and moral personhood. References are then made to the work of medical ethics committees and the role...
متن کاملRethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making.
In law, with rare exception such as legislative action, change is evolutionary and methodical. Unlike biomedical science where a breakthrough can quickly lead to dramatic changes in medical practice, legal precedent is more adherent and must evolve either through the legislative process or on a court by court basis in case law. Nevertheless, compelling evidence will pave the road to change with...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: North Carolina Medical Journal
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0029-2559,0029-2559
DOI: 10.18043/ncm.75.2.114